At first, she recoiled-“You’re asking me to undo 40-plus years of societal financial teachings in 30 minutes,” she said-but later she worried her refusal might jeopardize the relationship. Evelyn didn’t have that kind of cash on hand, so Bruce suggested that she she tap her individual retirement account (IRA). To minimize risk and maximize profit, Bruce said, it was better to play with larger sums: at least $200,000. I can see how this can be addicting,” she said to Bruce. Evelyn couldn’t follow what was going on, and the whole thing made her heart race, but within half an hour, she was up by 20 percent: “Dude. He had studied “the implementation of the international market trends,” he said, to tabulate the “precise time fluctuations of the rise and fall” of the coin. The layout was neat and the interface well-designed, there was a customer support function, and the feed updated in real time as the value of cryptocurrencies changed.īruce instructed her to perform a sequence of trades, with precise timing, betting on either an increase or decrease in the price of bitcoin. Evelyn was skeptical at first, but to her eye, the website looked legitimate. Bruce walked her through the process: moving cash from the bank into Coinbase, a regular exchange, then converting that cash into crypto and sending it to CEG. To pull off the trading strategy he had planned, Evelyn would need to use a special crypto exchange, called CEG. If Evelyn liked, he could introduce her to investing-starting small, with $4,000? Evelyn said that made her nervous, so they settled on half the amount. Bruce told her he was a partner at a venture capital firm but ran a crypto trading studio on the side. But today, we were well short.Before long, the conversation turned to work. Like I say, today hasn't happened that often. Yeah, without a doubt, of course we will pick the bones out of it and sit down with the players and go through it to try and help them individually, but they've got to take some responsibility as well, for their own development and performance levels on the pitch. However, when you look at the bigger picture, the best players on the pitch weren't in a Sky Blue shirt today.ĭoes it give you something to look at and learn from in the week as we head into the next one? I think the more experienced Under-21s players need to take responsibility and show more leadership skills in the build-up to the game and, obviously, when you get on the grass. And like I say, the desire levels were nowhere near it. Some of the defending that you expect to see in and around your penalty area wasn't there today. A lot of the one-on-one duels, they were coming out with the ball. Is that where the game was lost for you today, during the first half an hour or so? We've got a lot of exciting attacking players but, as a team, we've conceded too many goals and, like I say, the only credit today really goes to Ipswich because I thought they were at it from start to finish, and and we weren't. The best team won today and obviously it's back to the drawing board for us. I don't know whether that's because it was a hot day, or an early rise, but there's no excuse. I think they shared a lot more desire and hunger than us and it was almost like we were holding back a little bit. The first five minutes were unacceptable. If you start any game like that, it's going to be an uphill struggle. I think Ipswich were by the far superior team. So John, your thoughts on that one this afternoon?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |